前言
关于IKOULA:
IKOULA自1998年2月以来一直是网络托管，专用服务器和云计算的专家。在法国拥有2个数据中心（兰斯和埃佩斯），在荷兰和西班牙拥有2个业务部门。我们的解决方案“ CloudIKOULAONE”可在3大洲（欧洲，亚洲和美国）使用。我们的团队精通10多种不同语言，并提供24/7全天候服务，以帮助您完成项目。
申请开通的机型是FLEX'SERVER 1,也就是下图所示的这款VPS
选购地址
VPS虚拟服务器 选购地址 https://www.ikoula.cn/zh/服务器虚拟-VPS
以上为纯链接,无任何AFF.本站长不屑.
配置信息
测试产品 :FLEX'SERVER 1
测试ip：178.170.114.54
配置:1核 1GB内存 50GB硬盘 100Mbps带宽 免安装费
SSH连接
SSH操作的时候感觉还算流畅，运行脚本的时候数据几乎无滞后感，使用体验虽然比不上国内机器那么丝滑,但还是很不错的了.
综合测试
这款vps是Hyper-v架构,cpu和io都很不错,特别是io达到了近1GB/s.同配置算是很高的了.
延迟测试
在ping.pe上进行测试,分时段测了两次
延迟中规中矩,毕竟在欧洲,法国还是比较远的.丢包率也算是在意料之中
各地运营商测速
测试到这里我有点奇怪,我记得网站上说的是上下行100Mbps,测试的时候竟然感觉是上下都是G口,不知道是不是因为给我的是测试机器的原因. 不过可以看到,欧洲的机器跑的速度还是很高的
还是换一个测速脚本吧,下面是superbench修复版的测速结果
修复版的普遍偏低!可以看到,国外的确能跑到G口,但国内就不行了,平均10Mbit/s的速度还是比较不错的.
下面这是91yun的测试.基本可以断定,网络就是G口的.注意单位的不同(Mbps和MB/s)
回程路由
用wget -qO- git.io/besttrace | bash进行测试
电信
广州电信-TCP
traceroute to 14.215.116.1 (14.215.116.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 *
2 eth-trunk13.core14.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.161) 5.61 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 5.64 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
4 80.249.212.76 19.55 ms AS1200 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam ams-ix.net
5 202.97.13.25 216.19 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
6 202.97.13.25 215.63 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
7 202.97.94.129 230.48 ms AS4134 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
8 *
9 183.61.220.249 226.57 ms AS58543 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
10 14.215.116.1 227.43 ms AS58543 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
上海电信-TCP
traceroute to 101.95.120.109 (101.95.120.109), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 hpv178170123001.ikoula.com (178.170.123.1) 0.56 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
2 eth-trunk13.core14.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.161) 3.07 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 eth-trunk3.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.32.57) 0.92 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
4 80.249.212.76 22.11 ms AS1200 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam ams-ix.net
5 *
6 202.97.50.33 189.80 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
7 202.97.94.238 229.07 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
8 *
9 101.95.88.13 193.86 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
10 *
11 *
12 101.95.120.109 213.32 ms AS4812 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
宿迁电信-TCP
traceroute to 222.187.226.249 (222.187.226.249), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 hpv178170123001.ikoula.com (178.170.123.1) 0.49 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
2 eth-trunk13.core14.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.161) 3.27 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 eth-trunk3.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.32.57) 1.87 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
4 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 4.79 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
5 80.249.212.76 23.67 ms AS1200 Netherlands North Holland Amsterdam ams-ix.net
6 *
7 202.97.24.233 228.85 ms AS4134 China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
8 *
9 202.97.27.6 243.35 ms AS4134 China Jiangsu Nanjing ChinaTelecom
10 222.187.241.230 229.64 ms AS4134 China Jiangsu Suqian ChinaTelecom
11 *
12 *
13 *
14 *
15 222.187.226.249 253.77 ms AS4134 China Jiangsu Suqian ChinaTelecom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
茂名电信CN2-TCP
traceroute to 119.121.74.254 (119.121.74.254), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 *
2 eth-trunk13.core14.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.161) 4.39 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 4.92 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
4 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 3.02 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
5 100ge15-1.core1.mrs1.he.net (184.105.81.30) 21.13 ms AS6939 France Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur Marseille he.net
6 100ge14-2.core1.sin1.he.net (184.105.65.13) 146.96 ms AS6939 Singapore he.net
7 chinatelecomglobal-as4809.sgix (103.16.102.53) 244.01 ms * Singapore sgix.sg
8 59.43.189.205 273.04 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
9 59.43.189.205 268.62 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
10 59.43.130.145 269.53 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
11 59.43.136.182 270.09 ms * China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaTelecom
12 183.57.114.106 282.32 ms AS4134 China Guangdong ChinaTelecom
13 183.57.114.106 280.04 ms AS4134 China Guangdong ChinaTelecom
14 *
15 *
16 *
17 *
18 *
19 *
20 *
21 *
22 *
23 *
24 *
25 *
26 *
27 *
28 *
29 *
30 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------
联通
----------------------------------------------------------------------
茂名联通-TCP
traceroute to 122.13.195.241 (122.13.195.241), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 hpv178170123001.ikoula.com (178.170.123.1) 0.45 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
2 eth-trunk2.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.181) 3.29 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 eth-trunk3.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.32.57) 1.02 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
4 po2.core15.rb.ikoula.com (213.246.32.126) 9.57 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
5 ae3-100.cr0-par2.ip4.gtt.net (154.14.26.153) 2.78 ms AS3257 France Ile-de-France Paris interoute.com
6 ae27.cr1-fra2.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.181.254) 12.54 ms AS3257 Germany Hesse Frankfurt gtt.net
7 ae27.cr1-fra2.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.181.254) 12.27 ms AS3257 Germany Hesse Frankfurt gtt.net
8 219.158.11.153 223.41 ms AS4837 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaUnicom
9 219.158.16.77 232.08 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
10 219.158.4.169 256.31 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
11 219.158.4.169 278.00 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
12 *
13 120.80.253.18 311.49 ms AS17816 China Guangdong Maoming ChinaUnicom
14 *
15 120.80.253.102 313.26 ms AS17816 China Guangdong Maoming ChinaUnicom
16 *
17 *
18 122.13.195.241 283.68 ms AS17816 China Guangdong Maoming ChinaUnicom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
宿迁联通-TCP
traceroute to 153.36.242.70 (153.36.242.70), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 *
2 eth-trunk2.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.181) 3.29 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 3.23 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
4 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 3.59 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
5 ae3-100.cr0-par2.ip4.gtt.net (154.14.26.153) 2.85 ms AS3257 France Ile-de-France Paris interoute.com
6 ae18.cr11-lon2.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.141.213) 8.99 ms AS3257 United Kingdom London gtt.net
7 ae18.cr11-lon2.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.141.213) 9.85 ms AS3257 United Kingdom London gtt.net
8 219.158.97.197 230.17 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
9 219.158.97.201 234.07 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
10 *
11 219.158.18.65 256.83 ms AS4837 China Beijing ChinaUnicom
12 219.158.13.6 264.31 ms AS4837 China Jiangsu Nanjing ChinaUnicom
13 153.36.202.6 255.00 ms AS4837 China Jiangsu Suqian ChinaUnicom
14 153.36.202.6 260.43 ms AS4837 China Jiangsu Suqian ChinaUnicom
15 *
16 *
17 153.36.242.70 265.72 ms AS4837 China Jiangsu Suqian ChinaUnicom移动
----------------------------------------------------------------------
广州移动-TCP
traceroute to 112.35.1.99 (112.35.1.99), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 hpv178170123001.ikoula.com (178.170.123.1) 1.47 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
2 eth-trunk13.core14.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.161) 2.86 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 411.94 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
4 core11.th2.Eth-Trunk4.ikoula.com (213.246.50.194) 177.49 ms AS21409 France Ile-de-France Paris ikoula.com
5 prs-b5-link.telia.net (62.115.40.12) 3.15 ms AS1299 France Ile-de-France Paris telia.com
6 ldn-bb4-link.telia.net (62.115.114.228) 138.73 ms AS1299 United Kingdom London telia.com
7 ldn-bb3-link.telia.net (62.115.123.68) 143.60 ms AS1299 United Kingdom London telia.com
8 *
9 *
10 sea-b2-link.telia.net (62.115.117.48) 142.76 ms AS1299 United States Washington Seattle telia.com
11 *
12 *
13 *
14 *
15 *
16 221.176.18.113 364.39 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
17 221.183.63.126 318.47 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
18 221.183.63.122 321.97 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
19 *
20 *
21 *
22 *
23 *
24 *
25 *
26 *
27 *
28 *
29 *
30 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------
成都移动-TCP
traceroute to 183.221.253.100 (183.221.253.100), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 *
2 eth-trunk2.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.181) 4.91 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 ipv4.de-cix.fra.de.as58453.chinamobile.com (80.81.195.121) 17.15 ms AS52320 Germany Hesse Frankfurt de-cix.net
4 *
5 *
6 221.183.55.54 209.51 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
7 221.183.25.118 246.24 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
8 221.176.24.5 304.48 ms AS9808 China Guangdong Guangzhou ChinaMobile
9 221.176.18.182 284.06 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile
10 *
11 111.9.130.38 330.94 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile
12 223.87.85.54 325.36 ms AS9808 China Sichuan Chengdu ChinaMobile
13 *
14 *
15 *
16 *
17 *
18 *
19 *
20 *
21 *
22 *
23 *
24 *
25 *
26 *
27 *
28 *
29 *
30 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------教育网
成都教育网-TCP
traceroute to 202.112.14.151 (202.112.14.151), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 *
2 eth-trunk2.core16.ikdc1.ikoula.com (213.246.50.181) 4.99 ms AS21409 France Grand Est Reims ikoula.com
3 te0-0-1-2.rcr11.rhe01.atlas.cogentco.com (149.6.104.1) 1.16 ms AS174 France Grand Est Reims cogentco.com
4 be2172.agr22.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.77) 4.40 ms AS174 France Ile-de-France Paris cogentco.com
5 te0-7-0-14.agr21.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.36.21) 3.97 ms AS174 France Ile-de-France Paris cogentco.com
6 be3517.ccr41.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.49.41) 4.46 ms AS174 France Ile-de-France Paris cogentco.com
7 be2315.ccr31.bio02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.61.113) 16.38 ms AS174 Spain Euskadi Bilbao cogentco.com
8 be2112.ccr41.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.158) 98.48 ms AS174 United States Georgia Atlanta cogentco.com
9 be2690.ccr42.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.130) 108.86 ms AS174 United States Texas Houston cogentco.com
10 be2927.ccr21.elp01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.222) 127.75 ms AS174 United States Texas El Paso cogentco.com
11 be2928.ccr21.elp01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.162) 124.40 ms AS174 United States Texas El Paso cogentco.com
12 be2929.ccr31.phx01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.65) 136.03 ms AS174 United States Arizona Phoenix cogentco.com
13 be3360.ccr41.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.150) 147.45 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
14 be3360.ccr41.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.150) 148.02 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
15 38.88.196.186 202.80 ms AS174 United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
16 101.4.117.97 349.93 ms AS4538 China Beijing CHINAEDU
17 101.4.117.97 347.26 ms AS4538 China Beijing CHINAEDU
18 *
19 101.4.116.158 374.14 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU
20 202.115.254.238 369.94 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU
21 202.115.254.238 370.37 ms AS4538 China Sichuan Chengdu CHINAEDU
22 *
23 *
24 *
25 *
26 *
27 *
28 *
29 *
30 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------去程测试
去程的话我这边有点迷,说实话去程有点糊涂.
别的去程路由建议个人去https://tools.ipip.net/traceroute.php查询,我就不一一测试了
测试ip :178.170.114.54
UnixBench跑分
单核1534分,非常高的性能了.
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: frhb49312flex: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.11.8-041108-generic -- #201706290836 SMP Thu Jun 29 12:38:45 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5320.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
09:44:54 up 3:58, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.05, 0.01; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 10 2020 09:44:54 - 10:13:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28810614.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3690.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4496.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 980789.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 269878.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1910378.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1807427.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 249422.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11912.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8968.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1167.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3096781.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28810614.2 2468.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3690.6 671.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 4496.1 1045.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 980789.6 2476.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 269878.4 1630.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1910378.4 3293.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1807427.1 1452.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 249422.7 623.6
Process Creation 126.0 11912.7 945.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8968.9 2115.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1167.3 1945.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3096781.9 2064.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1532.4
91yun全面测试
结果如下图.后面再测一下GeekBench就行了.
Provider:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2659.996 MHz
Total amount of Mem : 906 MB
Total amount of Swap : 951 MB
System uptime : 0days, 3:49:1
IPaddr : 法国 大东部大区 兰斯 ikoula.com
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 9 x86_64 4.11.8-041108-generic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 931 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 961 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 964 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 952 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Server: Ikoula - Reims
ISP: Ikoula Net SAS
Latency: 0.28 ms
Download: 831.94 Mbps
Upload: 913.85 Mbps
Packet Loss: 0.8%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/b211565a-347b-432e-8d8b-c3de1ab2dd75
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
上海 电信 37.36 Mbps 129.26 Mbps 231.55 ms
广州 电信5G 128.87 Mbps 107.86 Mbps 217.47 ms
北京 联通 237.30 Mbps 116.90 Mbps 319.35 ms
重庆 联通 154.30 Mbps 13.61 Mbps 302.95 ms
广州 联通5G 227.37 Mbps 22.53 Mbps 340.64 ms
北京 移动 46.87 Mbps 431.64 Mbps 327.73 ms
重庆 移动 FAILED 1387.94 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 62.7MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 139.162.65.37 2.02MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 6.61MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.53MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 2.04MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 3.09MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 4.21MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
===测试 [北京电信（天翼云）] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [江苏徐州电信] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [广州电信（天翼云）] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [山东枣庄联通] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [江苏徐州联通] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [广东茂名联通] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [辽宁沈阳移动] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [江苏宿迁移动] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
===测试 [广东茂名移动] 到这台服务器的路由===
* * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------
===测试 [北京电信(天翼云)] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [江苏徐州电信] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [广州电信（天翼云）] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [山东枣庄联通] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [江苏徐州联通] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [广东茂名联通] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [辽宁沈阳移动] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [江苏宿迁移动] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
===测试 [广东茂名移动] 的回程路由===
/root/91yuntest/backtraceroute.sh: line 11: mtr: command not found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
线路 最快节点 延迟 最慢节点 延迟 平均延迟
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PING speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=232 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=232 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=232 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=231 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37): icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=232 ms
--- speedtest.shg1.linode.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 231.995/232.076/232.176/0.438 ms
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=219 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=218 ms
--- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 218.701/219.010/219.806/0.654 ms
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=134 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=134 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=134 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=134 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=134 ms
--- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 134.282/134.399/134.555/0.256 ms
PING speedtest.kdatacenter.com (175.126.118.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=258 ms
64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=263 ms
64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=257 ms
64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=263 ms
64 bytes from 175.126.118.139 (175.126.118.139): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=231 ms
--- speedtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 231.986/254.916/263.601/11.761 ms
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=264 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=264 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=264 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=264 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=240 time=264 ms
--- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 264.008/264.225/264.430/0.481 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
make all
make[1]: Entering directory '/root/91yuntest/UnixBench'
Checking distribution of files
./pgms exists
./src exists
./testdir exists
./tmp exists
./results exists
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/91yuntest/UnixBench'
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: frhb49312flex: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.11.8-041108-generic -- #201706290836 SMP Thu Jun 29 12:38:45 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5320.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
09:44:54 up 3:58, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.05, 0.01; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 10 2020 09:44:54 - 10:13:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28810614.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3690.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4496.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 980789.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 269878.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1910378.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1807427.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 249422.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11912.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8968.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1167.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3096781.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28810614.2 2468.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3690.6 671.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 4496.1 1045.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 980789.6 2476.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 269878.4 1630.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1910378.4 3293.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1807427.1 1452.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 249422.7 623.6
Process Creation 126.0 11912.7 945.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8968.9 2115.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1167.3 1945.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3096781.9 2064.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1532.4`.96总结
IKOULA作为老牌商家,VPS稳定性毋庸置疑.机器cpu性能很高,io也是非常不错.符合这个价位.
无论是作为建站的机器.还是用来跑计算或者编译.都是不错的选择.
© 版权声明
文章版权归作者所有,未经允许请勿转载。
THE END
暂无评论内容